-
What is already known about this topic
Parachutes are widely used to prevent death and major injury after gravitational challenge
Parachute use is associated with adverse effects due to failure of the intervention and iatrogenic injury
Studies of free
Anyone out there whoe knows about radio planning for networks? Does this mean their coverage will be identical?
"Most entrepreneurs not only suck at taking the company beyond that, they HATE having the responsibilities of running a growing organization too. Most entrepreneurs like things small, when they can have an idea and have it implented by the end of the day.
"I can't really explain it, but he, I firmly believe, would have been someone I would have benefited from knowing in more depth - that I didn't had something to do, however, with his propinquity for burying his fist in your throat."
About Me
Hello you. I'm the 36-year old Managing Director of Future Platforms. We make lovely things for mobile phones, for lots of people you've heard of (Microsoft, Hasbro, the BBC, Nokia, Channel 4) and many you won't have come across.
When I'm not doing that I read a lot, write here, and practice Aikido. I live in Brighton, a seaside town on the south coast of the UK.
Stalk Me
- Email me:
tom dot hume at futureplatforms dot com
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Juicy Couture Handbags on Roulette Cricket
- Juicy Couture Handbags on July
- Cell phone locator on Delightful maps and location-based gravy
- dean on Tracking UK Liberal Indecency
- niko on Guardian Anywhere
- Anonymous on Certified Scrum Practitioner
- Retro Jordans on Mobile Persuasion, City University
- Retro Jordans on Agile2009: Why (So many) Testers (Still) Hate Agile
- Payal Sood on Certified Scrum Practitioner
- Adrian McEwen on Rewired State Hack Day
They're so hot right now
« LIFT07 Wrap-up: Daniel Kaplan, Fdration Internet Nouvelle Gnration | Main | LIFT07: Decompression »
February 10, 2007
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Orange and Voda to Share Networks...
Only a matter of time really. 3G networks have a shorter range from the base stations and in addition there is only so much bandwidth (around 2MB from memory) that each base station can share between all active mobiles in that cell. Voice calls are realtively low bandwidth and proportionally make the most money, but increased data bandwidth requirements from individual devices with things like 3G soon chews that up, so again you need more cells to support a given number of active conversations.
Sharing sites helps both operators maintain coverage without thousands of new planning applications for new aerials that are strongly resisted by people in the area and cost millions in lawyers bills to push through.
Simon
Mi-Pay Ltd
Posted by: simon cavill | February 10, 2007 at 12:30 PM
Tom: From my reading of the article, yes: their coverage would be identical (assuming the agreement to share the RAN covers all base-stations). Again, from my reading, it looks like they will own their own back-hauls from each cell. It's been years since I looked at 3G designs, but either ATM or IP back-haul will allow VPNs, and hence the maintenance of 'separate core networks'.
Posted by: Dave Ph | February 12, 2007 at 10:56 AM