-
What is already known about this topic
Parachutes are widely used to prevent death and major injury after gravitational challenge
Parachute use is associated with adverse effects due to failure of the intervention and iatrogenic injury
Studies of free
Anyone out there whoe knows about radio planning for networks? Does this mean their coverage will be identical?
"Most entrepreneurs not only suck at taking the company beyond that, they HATE having the responsibilities of running a growing organization too. Most entrepreneurs like things small, when they can have an idea and have it implented by the end of the day.
"I can't really explain it, but he, I firmly believe, would have been someone I would have benefited from knowing in more depth - that I didn't had something to do, however, with his propinquity for burying his fist in your throat."
About Me
Hello you. I'm a 38-year old MSc student, studying Advanced Computer Science at Sussex University. I'm especially interested in Internet and mobile software, sensors and pervasive computing, user interfaces, and the process of developing great software.
Before that I spent 11 years running Future Platforms, a software company I co-founded which makes lovely things for mobile phones, and which I sold to Vexed Digital in 2011.
I read a lot, write here, and practice Aikido and airsoft. I live in Brighton, a seaside town on the south coast of the UK, with two cats and a clown.
Stalk Me
- Email me:
twhume at gmail dot com
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Steve Devo on Alarm clock: progress today
- Steve Devo on Alarm clock: progress today
- Fred_beecher on Prototyping touch interfaces
- Tom Hume on Alarm clock: progress today
- Andy on Alarm clock: progress today
- Tom Hume on Alarm clock: first sketches
- john cooper on Alarm clock: first sketches
- Tom Hume on Alarm clock: first sketches
- Kate Roberts on Alarm clock: first sketches
- Tom Hume on Alarm clock: first sketches
They're so hot right now
« LIFT07 Wrap-up: Daniel Kaplan, Fdration Internet Nouvelle Gnration | Main | LIFT07: Decompression »
February 10, 2007
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Orange and Voda to Share Networks...
Only a matter of time really. 3G networks have a shorter range from the base stations and in addition there is only so much bandwidth (around 2MB from memory) that each base station can share between all active mobiles in that cell. Voice calls are realtively low bandwidth and proportionally make the most money, but increased data bandwidth requirements from individual devices with things like 3G soon chews that up, so again you need more cells to support a given number of active conversations.
Sharing sites helps both operators maintain coverage without thousands of new planning applications for new aerials that are strongly resisted by people in the area and cost millions in lawyers bills to push through.
Simon
Mi-Pay Ltd
Posted by: simon cavill | February 10, 2007 at 12:30 PM
Tom: From my reading of the article, yes: their coverage would be identical (assuming the agreement to share the RAN covers all base-stations). Again, from my reading, it looks like they will own their own back-hauls from each cell. It's been years since I looked at 3G designs, but either ATM or IP back-haul will allow VPNs, and hence the maintenance of 'separate core networks'.
Posted by: Dave Ph | February 12, 2007 at 10:56 AM