My Photo

About Me

  • Hello you. I'm the 36-year old Managing Director of Future Platforms. We make lovely things for mobile phones, for lots of people you've heard of (Microsoft, Hasbro, the BBC, Nokia, Channel 4) and many you won't have come across.

    When I'm not doing that I read a lot, write here, and practice Aikido. I live in Brighton, a seaside town on the south coast of the UK.

Stalk Me

  • Email me:
    tom dot hume at futureplatforms dot com
Blog powered by TypePad

« links for 2007-09-10 | Main | links for 2007-09-11 »

September 10, 2007

Comments

Alex

Tom, thanks for the link - my hope is that a mobile widget engine could certainly provide this kind of functionality. As more people develop widgets and suggest new features we could enter that phase of rapid adoption. I'm trying to stick with the W3C standards as a baseline, but ultimately we need to be driven by the kinds of applications that *real* people want to use..

Alex
joemoby.com

Spencer

I think you are talking about an important transition. I was at the Moto Dev Summit yesterday in San Jose and heard Moto's pitch for their "WebUI" initiative based on WebKit. They are talking about the ability to ship a shell app that is largely server driven, renders HTML as a primary display mechanism, and has local JS support. Reported available at the end of this year on a few handsets.

I think where.com is interesting along these lines too. They are focused on supporing LBS enabled widgets, but I think their value as a generic widget engine could be more important in the long run (LBS is a feature not a product!).

Spencer
deepdarksee.com

Tomsoft

Hello Tom,

I definitively share your view too. We at webwag worked since two years on a mobile framework to display widget on phone. There is two levels of interest on this:
- the application iteslef (the renderer) can be easily updated OTA
- the content (Widget) can also be easily updated

It will take time before we'll see a stnadard framework (if any) emerge for this, so we think it's one of the best solution for now.

http://webwag.com/
and
http://webwag.com/mobile

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment